It's probably the first -- and one of the most important -- pieces of advice new writer's receive.
It doesn't really seem like it's a big deal -- to write what you know-- until you start comparing what you know to what other writers know. Then you might start thinking: How in the world could I possibly know as much about (insert your topic here) as Jodi Picoult does about the courtroom? The doubt those questions and comparisons cultivate are enough to push writers ever so close to what Christine Fonseca calls "The Ledge," that nasty place where you throw up your hands and say, "Forget it. There's no way I can compete."
The nice thing is (and pardon me for getting all Richard Simmons on you) Yes You Can!
How? The same way other writers, including Jodi Picoult, do it -- through research.
And that brings me to my topic for this round of blog chaintasticness: How do you do research for your settings, your story and your characters' quirks? What interesting tidbits about yourself and the world you live in have you learned along the way?
In a way, I'm dreading the research I'm working on for my new WIP, Whisper. It takes place in the mid-1970s, and the Vietnam War has heavily shaped the personality of a couple of the characters. One is a free-spirited hippie. The other is a vet (that's veteran, not veterinarian) whose memories torment him.
Aaahhh, relationships fractured by the world. Who could resist? Right?
The problem is that I was born in 1974 (shhhhh, don't tell), and I know very little about the Vietnam War, other than what I learned from the history books, saw on TV or surmised from talking to surviving veterans.
Because I'm an emotional writer, I prefer getting firsthand accounts so I can read through their expressions the depth of the grooves left on a person's soul. Since the vets I know don't like talking about their experience too much, I'm going to have to forget the sweet, savvy interview techniques I've learned as a reporter and try the conversation method.
My hope is to come away from this research with a better understanding of the world in which I live.
Time will tell, but if it's anything like the research I did for Long Road -- where post traumatic stress and a shattered happily ever after lead a Cinderella-type down the road of addiction, I'll come away richer than I am right now.
I've learned a lot from some really good people doing research for that story. Victoria Miles took me on a first-class tour of The Hill in St. Louis, where a good portion of the story takes place. Max Carl, who wrote the former No. 1 Billboard single "Second Chance," offered his take on certain facets of the music industry. Lynn Rush, a former drug and alcohol counselor, gave me the scoop on the daily routine of folks in rehab. And my husband, who will be three years sober in July (YAY!) gave me a front-row seat in the "What It's Like to Survive Withdrawal" class.
I approached each person in a different way. I met Victoria through a forum on The Hill's community Web site. After corresponding, we became friends. Max and I had mutual musician friends. I had corresponded with him on a couple of occasions about projects he'd been working on before I decided to approach him about my research. And Lynn . . . well, she's a blessing that swept through my life at a very convenient time. I didn't know she had been a counselor until after we'd been leaving messages on each others blogs for awhile.
Research has taught me so much more than what I initially sought to learn. It has taught me that there really are no stupid questions. It has taught me that most people, when asked for advice, are more than willing to give it. And it has taught me that knowledge can be a powerful asset.
How about you?
Now, head on over to Christine's blog and see what she has to say.
11 comments:
This looks like it should be a useful topic. I'm too shy to approach people for interviews, so it'll be helpful to see how other people do it.
I love that there are no stupid questions. And it's true; most people like to share things that they feel like they know. Good luck with your research!
Good topic and good post!
I haven't researched much. . .cept how others write fantasy. . .I am a fantasy/sci fi writer but until recently didn't read much.
Lots of techie things I researched tho!
Nice post. I can totally picture you as an emotional writer. You had me crying while reading some of your work! **smile** that's a good thing. I LOVE emotionally charged books. Sure, usually it's paired with some supernatural occurance in my writing, but still.... :-)
I write paranormal romance, contemporary, so I'm usually in the present time. BUt, since my characters usually have some freaky power...like one who can freeze things....well, I had to call a locksmith and talk to them about SAFES. Like what would happen if someone froze one...etc.
So, I like to talk to people about things I want to throw in my book. Also, one has a computer hacker in it....so I'm gonna meet with a computer junkie soon. Even though it's fiction....and paranormal...still has to have some sign of "real world"-ness. LOL. Like my word?
Great post, Kat! Write on, my friend.
I really like this post Kat, and the topic. And how cool is it that you get first hand accounts of things...it brings a great level of authenticity to your stories I bet.
I don't usually interview (other than the real world experience I have with my YA audience), But I do read first hand accounts of things whenever possible.
Great post!
That is so cool that you use your journalism background of research and interviews in your creative writing. I am actually a HUGE slacker when it comes to research, but reading this makes me think I should aspire to do more.
I really like this post because I'm afraid of research. I'm afraid of not doing enough research and getting something wrong, and I also feel too shy to talk to anyone. But, because you say there are no stupid questions, I will try to keep my mind open about it.
Interviews are a great way to get info for books...and often much less painful than having to dredge through a ton of stuff to find it :D I mostly like research...but it depends on what I'm looking up.
Oooh, interviewing -- that's such a cool approach to research. Like some of the others I'm a little shy about that kind of thing.
Great theme about research. Like some of the others, I would be too shy about interviewing strangers. However, I wouldn't have any problem interviewing family or friends. Vast founts of information.
Research sometimes keeps me so preoccupied that the actual writing can suffer! (lol)
I get a lot of background and location info from the Internet but also use one-on-one resources in an informal way. Real "interviews" intimidate me, but I find people are easier to talk to if I arrange to get together to chat over coffee. I'm more relaxed in my approach and they don't seem to feel like they're being put on the spot.
I've just discovered your blog and enjoyed reading. I'll be by again soon to read more. :)
Carol/Careann
Post a Comment